Student's
Question: "Andy, should I be looking at fundamentals?"
Andy:
There are a number of reasons that cause many traders to favor technical
analysis over fundamentals. For starters, fundamental traders tend
to be commercial firms; that is, they are involved in the actual
production or consumption of a commodity. Because of this, they have intimate, day-to-day knowledge of supply
and demand. The commercial firms have
information that most of us cannot afford to acquire. For example,
are you able to check global soil conditions in an agricultural
commodity you wish to trade? Can you check crop conditions? Commercial
firms can and do check such things. They also check long-range weather
forecasts, crop yield forecasts, and existing inventories.
Commercials have the best fundamental information
on a market. You and I have a harder time getting pertinent fundamental information,
especially in markets that are more thinly traded. Fundamental analysis
generally requires a longer term trading horizon. Fundamentals tend
to change more slowly than do technical conditions.
Technical
traders tend to be almost everyone except the commercials, such as commodity pools, funds, and
retail speculators. Speculators tend to trade in shorter time frames,
and technical analysis may better serve shorter term traders. It's
unlikely that fundamental analysis will tell you where beans may
be next week, but technical analysis may do so.
The
widespread use of technical analysis raises an interesting question
- does technical analysis work because it actually helps interpret
the markets, or does it work because it is widely followed, and
thus creates self-fulfilling prophecies for the markets? Whichever
it is, I don't care, as long as it works!